6 days ago · Experts long argued that airstrikes alone would not be capable of permanently ending Iran's nuclear program absent negotiations. WASHINGTON — A highly politicized debate is unfolding over the. While Trump claims to have destroyed Iran’s nuclear program, analysts say U.S. And Israeli attacks may have pushed the country closer to building a weapon. Recent International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reports indicate that Iran now possesses a large enough stockpile of 60% highly-enriched uranium to build seven nuclear weapons—a stockpile that doubled over the last four months alone. By any conceivable standard, Iran’s multi-dimensional threat to regional and international order is growing, and not only in the nuclear domain. The International Atomic Energy Agency has. 2 days ago · Iran just ended its cooperation with international inspectors, suggesting no post-bombing deal is imminent. That may point to a long game of hide-and-seek, punctuated by military action. US President Donald Trump ’s approach to the direct talks between Iran and the United States over Iran’s nuclear program could lead to dangerous consequences , Dr . Benny Sabti , a senior Iran. 3 days ago · The ongoing debate over whether Iranian nuclear sites were “obliterated”, as the US president and his team insist, or merely “damaged”, as much of the intelligence suggest, should make us. Although Iran says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, experts have long assessed that Iran was close to having the capability of building nuclear weapons, if it chose to do so. The controversy is about operation Midnight Hammer , in which American bombers and other aircraft struck Iran’s nuclear facilities. The debate is not — and should not be — about whether the.
The World Holds Its Breath: Iran Missile Attack on Israel – Live Updates
The Iran-Israel-Syria War: The Stakes Are Higher Than You Think
Iran vs Israel Conflict: On the Brink of Disaster?